ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Ziv-  
Aflibercept Vs Bevacizumab for the Treatment of  
Macular Edema  
Hussain Ahmad Khaqan1, Usman Imtiaz2, Hasnain Muhammad Buksh3  
Hafiz Ateeq-ur-Rehman4, Raheela Naz5  
1-5Ameer-ud-Din Medical College PGMI, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore Pakistan  
ABSTRACT  
Purpose: To study the safety and efficacy of intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept vs. Bevacizumab for the management of  
edema caused by different retinal pathologies.  
Study Design: Comparative interventional study.  
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from  
July 2018 to June 2019.  
Material and Methods: All patients with resistant, center involving macular edema due to diabetes, retinal vein  
occlusion and age related macular degeneration were recruited in this study. Complete baseline ocular  
examination was performed at presentation. All the patients were randomly grouped into two i.e. IVZ (intravitreal  
Ziv-Aflibercept) and IVB (intravitreal bevacizumab). Each eye underwent intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of fresh  
filtered ziv-aflibercept (1.25 mg) or 0.05 ml of fresh filtered Bevacizumab. Outcome was measured in terms of  
variation in central macular thickness (CMT) and also best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months.  
Results: Total of 156 eyes of 136 patients completed whole duration of study and were included in the results.  
The mean baseline CMT was 510 μm (± 94 μm) in the IVB group and 493μm (±102 μm) in the IVZ group (P =  
0.94). The mean baseline BCVA (log MAR) was 0.78 (Snellen's equivalent 6/36) in the IVZ and 0.70 (Snellen's  
equivalent 6/30) in the IVB group (P = 0.78). Central macular thickness was significantly reduced at 1st, 2nd and 3rd  
month in the IVZ group and IVB group (P < 0.001).  
Conclusion: Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept is safe and more effective than Bevacizumab for the treatment of edema  
caused by diabetes mellitus, retinal vein occlusion and wet age related macular degeneration.  
Key Words: Aflibercept, Ziv-Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, Diabetic Retinopathy, Wet Age related Macular  
degeneration, Retinal vein occlusion.  
How to Cite this Article: Khaqan HA, Imtiaz U, Buksh HM, R HAu, Naz R. Intravitreal Ziv-Afibercept Vs  
Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2020;36 (3): 205-210.  
Doi: 10.36351/pjo.v36i3.1014  
INTRODUCTION  
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs  
related macular degeneration (AMD), macular edema  
secondary to diabetes and retinal vein occlusions1.  
have become the standard of care for several  
chorioretinal vascular conditions including wet age  
Second most common retinal vascular condition i.e.  
macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion  
results in considerable decrease in best corrected  
visual acuity (BCVA)2. VEGF mediates the  
development of neovascularization in retinal vein  
Correspondence to: Hussain Ahmad Khaqan  
Ameer-ud-Din Medical College, Lahore Pakistan  
Received: March 10, 2020  
Accepted: June 16, 2020  
Revised: May 4, 2020  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 205-210  
205  
Hussain Ahmad Khaqan, et al  
occlusion which results in severe irreversible vision  
loss.  
Bevacizumab for the treatment of edema caused by  
diabetes mellitus, RVO and wet AMD.  
The WESDR (Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of  
Diabetic Retinopathy) found that there are 26%  
chances of developing DME after 14 years in type I  
diabetes, whereas Diabetes Control and Complication  
Trial (DCCT) reported that 27% of type I diabetics  
develop DME after 9 years4. Type II diabetes in older  
patients is associated with higher incidence of macular  
edema5. Retinal Ischemia promotes VEGF production,  
which in turns mediates the development of  
neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy and may  
lead to severe irreversible vision loss.  
MATERIAL AND METHODS  
A prospective, comparative interventional study was  
conducted in the Ophthalmology department, Unit II  
of Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from July 2018 to  
June 2019. Institutional Review Board approval was  
obtained and study followed tennets of declaration of  
Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the  
patients. All patients with resistant, center involving  
macular edema due to diabetes; retinal vein occlusion  
and wet age related macular degeneration were  
recruited in this study. Patients with only eye,  
uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension,  
advanced cataract, uncontrolled glaucoma, epiretinal  
membrane (ERM) or vitreo macular traction and prior  
intervention with laser and intravitreal injection were  
excluded from the study.  
The basic problem in wet age related macular  
degeneration (AMD) leading to 1.6% of blindness of  
American population is abnormal neovascularization  
and vascular permeability. Positive regulators like  
vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A),  
transforming growth factor α and β (TGF α and β),  
fibroblast growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor,  
connective tissue growth factor and interleukins; and  
negative regulators: pigment epithelium-derived factor  
(PEDF), thrombostatin, angiostatin and endostatins  
play an important role in angiogenesis6. Intraocular  
VEGF is reduced by the anti-VEGF agents  
administered in the eyes of patients, which reduces the  
vascular permeability and stops vascular leakage7.  
Complete baseline ocular examination was  
performed at presentation including best corrected  
visual acuity (BCVA), anterior segment examination,  
posterior segment examination and indirect  
ophthalmoscopy, intra-ocular pressure assessment,  
OCT and FFA (optical coherence tomogram and  
fundus fluorescein angiography respectively). BCVA  
was performed using Snellen’s visual acuity chart and  
also using Log MAR scale. The OCT was performed  
using Cirrus 5000 (Zeiss, Dublin, CA). Thickness of  
central retina was measured in a 3 mm circle centered  
on point of fixation. Central 1 mm zone was taken as  
central macular thickness (CMT).  
Ranibizumab was the first approved anti-VEGF  
agent that revolutionized DME treatment8. Recently,  
newer anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)  
drug, aflibercept (Eyelea®, Bayer Healthcare,  
Germany), approved by Food and  
Drug  
Administration (FDA), has shown good treatment  
outcomes in patients with macular edema secondary  
to CRVO7. Eylea (Aflibercept) is approved therapy for  
macular edema caused by Age related macular  
degeneration, diabetes and retinal vein occlusion8.  
All the patients that fulfilled the inclusion and  
exclusion criteria were assigned to one of the two  
different treatment groups randomly: 1.25 mg  
(0.05 ml) of Ziv-aflibercept (ZALTRAP; Regeneron  
Pharmaceuticals Inc) (IVZ group) and 1.25 mg  
(0.05 ml) of Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc,  
South San Francisco, CA) (IVB group).  
Randomization was performed using random number  
table. Participants and the investigators were masked  
of the study groups. Surgeons other than the study  
investigators performed all the interventions.  
Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap; Regeneron, New York,  
USA) is pharmacologically similar to aflibercept, and  
the mechanism of action is also similar to Aflibercept  
i.e. it acts on all VEGF subtypes as well as placental  
growth factor. It is approved by FDA for the treatment  
of colon cancer, and is available at pharmacies much  
cheaper than aflibercept particularly for ocular use9.  
Toxicity to RPE (retinal pigment epithelial cells) has  
never been studied in previous studies by using  
approved cancer protein, ziv-aflibercept10.  
After taking aseptic measures, each eye received  
intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of filtered ziv-  
aflibercept (1.25 mg) or 0.05 ml of fresh filtered  
Bevacizumab in the operation theater. 30-guage  
tuberculin syringes were used to deliver the injection  
under topical anesthesia. All eyes underwent slit-lamp  
The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy  
and safety of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept with that of  
206  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 205-210  
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept Vs Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema  
examination at 1st and 7th post-operative day to look  
equivalent 6/30) in the IVB group (P = 0.78).  
for any intra-ocular inflammation and raised intra-  
ocular pressure. Minimum of three doses were given to  
all the participants at 4 weekly intervals. BCVA, slit  
lamp assessment and Optical Coherence Tomography  
were performed again at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th months.  
There was significant improvement in the best  
corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after every 1 month  
interval in both groups (P < 0.001). At 3rd month best  
corrected visual acuity difference was significant  
among the groups. Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept group  
showed significant changes in the best corrected visual  
acuity (BCVA) as compared to intravitreal  
bevacizumab group (Table 2 and Fig 1).  
Measurement of change in CMT (central macular  
thickness) and BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) at  
3rd month was the primary outcome. Secondary  
outcome measures were change in BCVA and CMT at  
1st, 2nd and 6th month. Any potential eye related and  
systemic complications related to the intervention  
were assessed at each follow-up visit.  
Table 2: Comparison of Visual acuity at 1st, 2nd and 3rd  
month.  
Groups  
Total  
IVZ  
IVB  
Baseline  
4 Weeks  
Change  
8 Weeks  
Change  
12 Weeks  
Change  
0.74 ± 0.21  
0.61 ± 0.20  
0.13 ± 0.21  
0.52 ± 0.16  
0.22 ± 0.19  
0.45 ± 0.12  
0.29 ± 0.16  
0.78 ± 0.22  
0.60 ± 0.21  
0.18 ± 0.20  
0.48 ± 0.17  
0.30 ± 0.19  
0.42 ± 0.13  
0.36 ± 0.16  
0.70 ± 0.21  
0.62 ± 0.19  
0.08 ± 0.20  
0.56 ± 0.15  
0.14 ± 0.18  
0.48 ± 0.11  
0.22 ± 0.16  
RESULTS  
Primarily 162 eyes of 141 patients satisfied our  
inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of this 5 patients (7  
eyes) were lost to follow-up. So total of 156 eyes of  
136 patients completed whole duration of study and  
were included in the results. IVZ group included 70  
patients (81 eyes) and IVB group had 66 patients (75  
eyes). Twenty patients had bilateral injections.  
Table 1 shows demographic data. Two groups  
carry no difference regarding demographic and  
baseline features. The mean baseline central macular  
thickness was 510 μm (± 94 μm) in the intravitreal  
bevacizumab group and 493 μm (±102 μm) in the  
intravitreal ziv-aflibercept group (P = 0.94). The mean  
baseline BCVA (logMAR) was 0.78 (Snellen's  
equivalent 6/36) in the IVZ and 0.70 (Snellen's  
Table 1: Demographic data of the two groups.  
Fig. 1: Graph showing BCVA during the course of study.  
Groups  
Total  
IVZ  
IVB  
No. of Eyes  
No. of Subjects  
Age (Years)  
Mean SD  
Sex  
156  
136  
81  
70  
75  
66  
In comparison to the baseline values, central  
macular thickness decreased significantly at 1st, 2nd,  
and 3rd month in the IVZ group and IVB group (P <  
0.001). Overall, in all visits, CMT was much reduced  
in the IVZ group in comparison to the IVB group  
(Table 3 and Fig. 2). At 24 weeks follow-up, BCVA  
and CMT were significantly improved in both  
treatment arms (P < 0.001). BCVA changes were  
significantly better in the IVZ group as compared to  
the IVB group.  
59.5 ± 3  
60 ± 2  
59 ± 4  
Male  
Female  
75  
61  
41  
29  
34  
32  
Eye  
Right  
Left  
Lens Status  
Phakic  
Pseudophakic  
Baseline BCVA  
(Log MAR)  
Mean ± SD  
Baseline CMT  
Mean ± SD  
90  
66  
51  
30  
39  
36  
107  
49  
66  
23  
41  
26  
0.7 ± 0.21 0.78 ± 0.22 0.70 ± 0.21  
In our study, in IVZ group, 3 eyes experienced  
sterile intraocular inflammation while 2 eyes showed  
significant progression of cataract.  
501.5µm ±  
98µm  
493µm ± 510µm ±  
102µm 94µm  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 205-210  
207  
Hussain Ahmad Khaqan, et al  
Table 3: Comparison of CMT between two groups at 1st, 2nd  
and 3rd month.  
Groups  
Total  
IVZ  
IVB  
Baseline 501.5 µm ± 98 µm 493 µm ± 102 µm 501.5 µm ± 94 µm  
4 Weeks 433 µm ± 90 µm 420 µm ± 94 µm 446 µm ± 86 µm  
Change  
8 Weeks 387 µm ± 77 µm 328 µm ± 66 µm 378 µm ± 76 µm  
Change 114.5 ± 86 213 ± 78 132 ± 86  
12 Weeks 310 µm ± 68 µm 280 µm ± 66 µm 340 µm ± 70 µm  
Change 191.5 ± 78 213 ± 78 170 ± 82  
68.5 ± 94  
73 ± 87  
64 ± 90  
Fig. 2: Graphs showing central macular thickness (CMT)  
changes during the study.  
12-weeks and concluded that both doses of ziv-  
aflibercept were superior to Bevacizumab in terms of  
final BCVA and CMT15.  
DISCUSSION  
Limited data is available which compares the safety  
profiles and efficacy of ziv- aflibercept anti-vascular  
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug with other  
commonly used agents. Oliveira Dias et al stated that  
there were no changes in ERG in patients with AMD  
who received intravitreal ziv-aflibercept showing no  
toxicity to retinal tissue and there was visual and OCT  
improvements seen in the patients. Intra ocular  
inflammation was observed in one of the eyes and the  
inflammation resolved after taking appropriate  
therapy11. De Andrade G et al conducted a study in  
which they injected intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in  
seven patients with macular edema due to diabetes.  
They studied the safety and efficacy of ziv-aflibercept  
over 48 weeks period and concluded that the drug was  
safe and effective12.  
In one study of intravitreal injections of ziv  
aflibercept for DME, a prospective single-treatment  
clinical trial, demonstrated that ziv-aflibercept  
monotherapy was linked with substantial improvement  
in mean BCVA and CMT in a 24-week follow-up.  
There was also no ERG evidence of retinal toxic  
reactions after intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections in  
eyes with DME16.  
Cost is a major factor when it comes to selecting  
anti-VEGF for the treatment of macular edema. Most  
of these patients require monthly injections and this  
can add up to a huge amount of money. Compounded  
intravitreal Bevacizumab and Ziv-aflibercept costs  
arount USD 50 per dose, which is 15-20 times less  
than the cost of Ranibizumab or Aflibercept17.  
Another study conducted by Singh et al  
constituted the largest pooled safety report on IVZ use  
and included patients from 14 centres distributed  
across the globe. It showed that IVZ had an acceptable  
ocular and systemic safety profile with incidence of  
adverse events similar to those of other vascular  
endothelial growth factor inhibitory drugs. The  
analysis supported the continued use of IVZ in various  
retinal disorders13.  
One study showed that use of Aflibercept instead  
of Bevacizumab has lead to overspending of about  
€335 million in one year in europe18. So Ziv-  
aflibercept can prove to be a very valuable agent for  
the treatment of macular edema especially in under-  
developed and developing countries where insurance  
covering is scarce. One of the major concerns for  
compounded intravitreal injections is the risk of  
endophthalmitis19.  
Papadopoulos et al compared two different doses  
of Ziv-aflibercept with other anti VEGF in treating wet  
Age related macular degeneration. They followed the  
patients for 16-weeks and concluded that both doses of  
Ziv-aflibercept were superior to Bevacizumab in terms  
of final BCVA and CMT14.  
Both aflibercept and ziv-aflibercept are  
structurally similar containing the same fusion protein,  
but there are few differences like in the osmolarity.  
300 mOsm/kg is the osmolarity of aflibercept which is  
iso-osmotic solution and 1000 mOsm/kg is the  
osmolarity of ziv-aflibercept which is more  
concentrated. In addition, the 0.05ml of ziv-aflibercept  
contains 1.25 mg whereas aflibercept contains 2.0 mg.  
Baghi et al compared two different doses of  
Zaltrap with Avastin for the management of macular  
edema due to diabetes. They followed the patients for  
208  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 205-210  
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept Vs Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema  
In our study we demonstrated intermediate term  
AuthorsDesignation and Contribution  
outcomes, which were in favour of ziv-aflibercept. At  
all follow-ups, BCVA was significantly better in  
patients who received ziv-aflibercept as compared to  
those who received Bevacizumab. Similarly, better  
CMT reduction was achieved in ziv-aflibercept group  
than in Bevacizumab group.  
Hussain Ahmad Khaqan; Associate Professor: Study  
conception, Study Design, Manuscript Revision.  
Usman Imtiaz; Vitreoretinal Fellow: Manuscript  
writing, Data Analysis, Critical Revision.  
Hasnain Muhammad Buksh; Vitreoretinal Fellow:  
Manuscript writing, Literature Review, Study Design.  
Ziv-aflibercept shares the same molecular  
structure as aflibercept. However, the manufacturing  
process of aflibercept involves more robust  
purification and use of buffers to reduce the ocular  
irritation and toxicity20. In our study 3 eyes (3.7%)  
demonstrated sterile intraocular inflammation in ziv-  
aflibercept group. This is significant and difference in  
manufacturing process of ziv-aflibercept may explain  
this incidence. All of the three patients were managed  
medically and none of them had reduction in final  
BCVA as compared to than baseline. Ziv-aflibercept is  
prepared in laboratory with slightly hypertonic  
sucrose, which damages the lens and retina, it causes  
mild mitochondrial toxicity in human RPE cells8. In  
our study however, we did not experience any case of  
retinal toxicity but in 2 eyes (2.5%) there was  
significant cataract progression.  
Hafiz Ateeq-ur-Rehman; Post Graduate Resident:  
Data collection, Data Analysis, Proofreading.  
Raheela Naz; Post Graduate Resident: Data collection,  
Literature Review, Proofreading.  
REFERENCES  
1. Chhablani J. Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept for recurrent  
macular edema secondary to central retinal venous  
occlusion. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015; 1; 63 (5): 469.  
2. Paulose R, Chhablani J, Dedhia CJ, Stewart MW,  
Mansour AM. Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept for macular  
edema following retinal vein occlusion. Clin  
Ophthalmol. (Auckland, NZ). 2016; 10: 1853.  
3. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The  
Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic  
Retinopathy: XVII: The 14-year incidence and  
progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk  
factors in type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology, 1998; 105:  
180115.  
Limitations of our study include small sample size  
and relatively shorter follow-up period. Long term  
outcomes and complications need to be addressed by  
having a larger patient pool and longer duration of  
follow-ups.  
4. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research  
Group. Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus  
conventional treatment in the Diabetes Control and  
Complications Trial. Ophthalmology, 1995; 102: 647–  
61.  
CONCLUSION  
5. Bhagat N, Grigorian RA, Tutela A, Zarbin MA.  
Diabetic macular edema: Pathogenesis and treatment.  
Surv Ophthalmol. 2009; 54: 132.  
Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept is more effective than  
Bevacizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular  
edema. However, complications like sterile intra-  
ocular inflammation and cataract progression caused  
by intravitreal ziv-aflibercept needs to be investigated  
in detail.  
6. Dervenis N, Mikropoulou AM, Tranos P, Dervenis  
P. Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular  
Edema: A Review of the Current Status, Unmet Needs,  
and Emerging Challenges. AdvTher. 2017; 34 (6):  
1270-1282. Doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0548-1.  
7. De Oliveira Dias JR, de Andrade GC, Novais EA,  
Farah ME, Rodrigues EB. Fusion proteins for  
treatment of retinal diseases: aflibercept, ziv-  
aflibercept, and conbercept. Int J Retin Vitr. 2016; 2  
(1): 3.  
Acknowledgement  
This study was funded by the OSP research fund.  
Ethical Approval  
The study was approved by the Institutional review  
board/Ethical review board.  
8. Malik D, Tarek M, del Carpio JC, Ramirez C,  
Boyer D, Kenney MC, et al. Safety profiles of anti-  
VEGF drugs: bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept  
and ziv-aflibercept on human retinal pigment  
epithelium cells in culture. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98  
(Suppl 1): i11-6..  
Conflict of Interest  
Authors declared no conflict of interest  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 205-210  
209  
Hussain Ahmad Khaqan, et al  
Armed, Double-Blind Randomized Trial. Ophthalmol  
Retin. 2017; 1 (2): 10310.  
16. Andrade GC, Dias JR, Maia A, Farah ME, Meyer  
CH, Rodrigues EB. Intravitreal injections of ziv-  
aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Retina, 2016;  
36 (9): 1640-5.  
9. Chhablani J, Narayanan R, Mathai A, Yogi R,  
Stewart M. Short-term safety profile of intravitreal ziv-  
aflibercept. Retina. 2016 Jun 1; 36 (6): 1126-31.  
10. Mansour AM, Al-Ghadban SI, Yunis MH, et al. Ziv-  
aflibercept in macular disease Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;  
99: 1055-1059.  
17. Ross EL, Hutton DW, Stein JD, Bressler NM,  
Jampol LM, Glassman AR, et al. Cost-effectiveness  
of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for  
Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: Analysis From the  
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network  
Comparative Effectiveness Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol.  
2016; 134 (8): 888896.  
11. de Oliveira Dias JR, de Andrade GC, Kniggendorf  
VF, Novais EA, Takahashi VK, Maia A, et al.  
Intravitreal ziv-aflibercept for neovascular age-related  
macular degeneration: 52-week results. Retina. 2019  
Apr 1; 39 (4): 648-55.  
12. Andrade G, de Oliveira Dias J, Maia A, Farah M,  
Meyer C, Rodrigues E. Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept for  
Diabetic Macular Edema: 48-Week Outcomes.  
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2018; 49:  
245-250. Doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180329-06.  
13. Singh SR, Stewart MW, Chattannavar G, Ashraf M,  
Souka A, ElDardeery M, et al. Safety of 5914  
intravitreal ziv-aflibercept injections. Br J Ophthalmol.  
2019; 103 (6): 805-10.  
14. Papadopoulos Z. Aflibercept: A review of its effect on  
the treatment of exudative age-related macular  
degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul; 29 (4): 368-  
78.  
15. Baghi A, Bonyadi MHJ, Ramezani A, Azarmina M,  
Moradian S, Dehghan MH, et al. Two Doses of  
Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept versus Bevacizumab in  
Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Three-  
Doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669.  
18. Asten VF, Michels CTJ, Hoyng CB, van der Wilt  
effectiveness of bevacizumab, ranibizumab and  
aflibercept for the treatment of age-related macular  
degeneration-A cost-effectiveness analysis from a  
societal perspective. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (5):  
e0197670.  
19. Schwartz SG, Flynn HW Jr. Endophthalmitis  
Associated with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial  
Growth Factor Injections. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2014;  
2 (1): 15. Doi: 10.1007/s40135-013-0033-1.  
20. Trichonas G, Kaiser PK. Aflibercept for the treatment  
of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Ther.  
2013; 2 (2): 8998. Doi: 10.1007/s40123-013-0015-2.  
.…….  
210  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 205-210