ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central  
Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in  
Diabetic Macular Edema  
Muhammad Ali Haider1, Uzma Sattar2  
1-2Department of Ophthalmology, Rahbar Medical and Dental College, Lahore  
ABSTRACT  
Purpose: To evaluate the change in visual acuity (Log MAR) in relation to decrease in central macular thickness,  
after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection.  
Study Design: Quasi experimental study.  
Place and Duration of Study: Rahbar Medical & Dental College, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore,  
from January 2019 to June 2019.  
Material and Methods: 70 eyes of 70 patients diagnosed with diabetic macular edema were included in the  
study. Patients having high refractive errors (spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual acuity worse than +1.2  
or better than +0.2 on log MAR were excluded. Patients with ocular diseases other than diabetic macular edema  
were also excluded. Central macular edema was measured in µm on OCT and visual acuity was documented  
using Log MAR chart. These values were documented before and at 01 month after injection with intravitreal  
Bevacizumab (1.25 mg in 0.05 ml). Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate the difference in VA before  
and after the anti-VEGF injection. Difference in visual acuity and macular edema (central) was observed,  
analyzed and represented in p value. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.01%.  
Results: Mean age of patients was 52.61 ± 1.3. Vision improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 on log MAR  
chart. The change was statistically significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular thickness reduced from 328 ±  
14 to 283 ± 10.6 µm on OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p value < 0.001.  
Conclusion: A 45 µm reduction in central macular thickness was associated with 0.1 Log MAR unit improvement  
in visual acuity after intravitreal Bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema.  
Key Words: Visual acuity, Macular edema, Central macular thickness, Bevacizumab.  
How to Cite this Article: Haider MA, Sattar U. Zaidi SR. Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular  
Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2020, 36 (3): 292-297.  
Doi: 10.36351/pjo.v36i3.1051  
threatening condition. This increased thickness leads  
to reduction in visual acuity. Currently, intravitreal  
INTRODUCTION  
Diabetic macular edema results in increased central  
anti-VEGF drugs are recommended for management  
retinal thickness at macula which is a sight  
of diabetic macular edema1. These drugs are safe,  
decrease macular edema and restore vision. Amongst  
Correspondence to: Muhammad Ali Haider  
Department of Ophthalmology  
Rahbar Medical and Dental College, Lahore  
Email: alihaider_189@yahoo.com  
the various anti-VEGF agents available, Bevacizumab  
(1.25 mg in 0.05 ml) has revolutionized the  
management of diabetic macular edema in recent  
years. It is used off label in the developing world2,3. It  
is a humanized monoclonal antibody that swathes with  
all isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factors-A,  
Received: April 20, 2020  
Accepted: June 17, 2020  
Revised: May 8, 2020  
292  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 292-297  
Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema  
with a molecular mass of 149 kDa that effectively  
status, slit lamp examination for anterior and  
posterior segments was performed. Based on the  
clinical findings diabetic macular edema was  
diagnosed and the central macular thicknesswas  
measured in micron meter (µm) on OCT (NIDEK  
RS-3000 Advance). In selected patients, single  
dose of intravitreal anti-VEGF was injected by  
senior consultant ophthalmologist. Distance visual  
acuity and OCT parameters were re-evaluated one  
month after the intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy.  
binds and inhibits all the isoforms of VEGF4,5.  
Significant decrease in leakage from vessels has also  
been observed in proliferative diabetic retinopathy  
treated with single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab  
(1.25 mg)6. It results in improved visual acuity (VA)  
with reduction in macular thickness7. Anti-VEGF or  
implantable dexamethasone with or without retinal  
laser are considered to be the treatment of choice in  
DME8.  
Improvement in diabetic macular edema is gauged  
by repeatedly measuring central retinal thickness,  
before and after the start of treatment using high  
resolution OCT (optical coherence tomography), a  
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22.  
Quantitative data was represented as mean ± S.D.  
and S.E. while the qualitative data was  
represented in the form of pie chart.  
diagnostic tool for management of retinal diseases9,10  
.
The aim of this prospective study was to correlate  
the improvement in visual acuity with the  
corresponding reduction in central macular thickness  
after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab therapy  
in patients with diabetic macular edema.  
RESULTS  
A total of 70 eyes of 70 patients, 40 (57%) males and  
30 (43%) females were enrolled in this research by  
convenient sampling technique. Mean age of the  
patients was 52.61 ± 1.3 with minimum age of 22  
years and maximum 74 years (Table 1). Normality  
MATERIAL AND METHODS  
The study was conducted at the Department of  
Table 1: Assumption Test of Normality Using Shapiro-Wilk.  
Ophthalmology Rahbar Medical  
&
Dental  
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk  
Statistic df Sig. Statistic Df Sig.  
College, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital,  
Lahore after approval from the ethical committee.  
In this Quasi experimental study, 70 eyes with  
diabetic macular edema were enrolled, having a  
clear media for OCT with minimum of 3 mm  
pupil diameter and best corrected visual acuity  
(BCVA) of +0.2 to +1.2 on log MAR with snellen  
equivalent of 6/12 to 6/120.  
VA after injection  
VA before injection  
OCT before injection  
OCT after injection  
.160  
.169  
.255  
.206  
70 .000 .919  
70 .000 .935  
70 .000 .791  
70 .000 .832  
70 .000  
70 .001  
70 .000  
70 .000  
assumption was checked by using Shapiro-Wilk test.  
All quantitative variables were considered to have  
normal distribution with p-value > 0.05 while the p-  
value of ≤ 0.05 was considered as not normally  
distributed. Shapiro-Wilk test shows abnormal  
distribution of Visual acuity and macular  
measurements (µm) on OCT (Table 2). There were  
The patients having high refractive errors  
(spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual  
acuity worse than +1.2 or better than +0.2 on log  
MAR were excluded. Any other ocular condition  
in which after treatment, the improvement in  
vision was not significant (e.g. ocular  
degenerative/dystrophic changes) and patients  
having any media opacity that could affect the  
visual acuity and OCT measurements were also  
excluded.  
Table 2: Descriptive Statistic of Age (Years).  
In the selected patients, prior to intravitreal  
injection of anti-VEGF, LogMAR distance visual  
acuity was recorded and a full ophthalmological  
examination including evaluation of refractive  
Age of  
patients  
70  
52  
22  
74  
52.61 1.373 11.488  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 292-297  
293  
Muhammad Ali Haider, et al  
Table 3: Distribution of Macular Edema among Patients  
different stages of diabetic retinopathy in 70 eyes.  
Details are shown in table 3.  
Having Different Types of Diabetic Retinopathy.  
Type of Diabetic  
Retinopathy  
High risk PDR  
Low risk PDR  
Severe NPDR  
Very severe NPDR  
Total  
Type of Macular Edema  
Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate  
the difference in VA before and after the anti-VEGF  
injection. It improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02  
on log MAR chart. The change was statistically  
significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular  
thickness reduced from 328 ± 14 to 283 ± 10.6 µm on  
OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p  
value < 0.001 (Table 4).  
CSMO  
Diffuse  
Total  
2
10  
33  
25  
1
7
1
3
27  
22  
57  
6
3
13  
70  
Table 4: Description and Comparison in Visual Acuity and OCT.  
Minimum Value Maximum Value  
Mean Value  
Statistics  
Std.  
Deviation  
Range um  
P value  
Statistic  
Statistics  
Statistics  
VA before injection  
VA after injection  
OCT before injection  
OCT after injection  
1.0  
0.9  
490  
319  
.3  
.3  
215  
161  
1.3  
1.2  
705  
480  
.890  
.840  
328.43  
283.44  
.0261  
.0278  
14.348  
10.672  
.2181  
.2324  
120.041  
89.287  
< 0.001  
< 0.001  
Graph 1: Visual acuity before and after the intravitreal anti-VEGF  
(Bevacizumab).  
Graph 2: Macular thickness before and after intravitreal anti-VEGF  
(Bevacizumab).  
VA_A: Visual Acuity Before  
VA_B: Visual Acuity After  
OCT_A = OCT After Injection  
OCT_B= OCT Before Injection  
documented the correlational change after a single  
injection of intravitreal bevacizumab injection between  
visual acuity and central macular thickness on OCT.  
DISCUSSION  
Clinical evidence has established that increase in  
central macular thickness in diabetic macular edema  
results in corresponding decrease in visual acuity, and  
the treatment which reduces the retinal thickening  
improves vision. OCT can detect macular edema that  
is not clinically evident, and several OCT-derived  
biomarkers are useful predictors of its progression,  
severity, and visual outcome11. In this study, we  
At any given central macular thickness, there was  
a corresponding significant change in visual acuity.  
Many eyes with significant macular edema had very  
good visual acuity and eyes with mild edema exhibited  
a profound decrease in vision. It is also reported that  
there is inconsistence increase in thickness of central  
294  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 292-297  
Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema  
macular point with the increase in visual acuity as well  
was a significant improvement from baseline to  
0.34+/-0.13, 0.25+/-0.12 and 0.17+/-0.12 Log MAR  
units at 1 monthly intervals after the three injections.  
At final visit at 6 months, the visual acuity was 0.16+/-  
0.14 Log Mar units. With a P value of P > 0.0001, the  
difference was statistically significant. The mean  
central retinal thickness of central 1 mm area  
improved from 452.9 +/- 143.1 microns at base linento  
279.8 +/- 65.2 microns (P < 0.0001) on the final  
visit.14 Another study also suggested that Bevacizumab  
is helpful in significant macular edema reduction and  
visual acuity improvement in wet age related Macular  
Degeneration.15  
as incongruous decrease in thickness of central retina  
with the decrease in visual acuity is not common.2  
According to this, OCT measurement can be a good  
surrogate for visual acuity in macular edema related to  
diabetes.  
Diabetic macular edema is the major clinical  
factor affecting visual acuity in diabetic retinopathy  
and is quantified for assessment and response to  
treatment by the central retinal thickness measured by  
OCT. Visual acuity is inversely related to the retinal  
thickness to some extent. In this study we found a  
strong correlation of visual acuity with OCT  
measurements of macular thickness (r2= -0.46). After  
the intravitreal bevacizumab therapy, the visual acuity  
improved with the reduction in retinal thickness. This  
study has shown that after a single dose of  
Bevacizumab therapy the central retinal thickness on  
OCT improved from 328 ± 14 to 283 ± 10.6 µm with a  
corresponding improvement in the mean visual acuity  
from 0.9 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 with significant p value  
˂0.01.  
In their study Santos et al. described the factors  
affecting response to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections  
in patients of diabetic macular edema. They found that  
BCVA improved from 4.78 and 5.52 letters, and a  
central retinal thickness decreased from 80.25 and  
106.12 microns after 3 and 6 months of treatment.  
They concluded that optimal responders to anti-VEGF  
therapy could be identified based on their response to  
decrease in central retinal thickness and hence, could  
be a predictor of BCVA improvement after the  
treatment16.  
Recent studies have suggested that anti-VEGF  
drugs are safe, cost effective, and easily admissible in  
clinical settings, well tolerated by the patients and  
remarkably well suited for treating macular edema  
secondary to diabetes. The efficacy of bevacizumab  
(1.25 mg) has been demonstrated in a study conducted  
on patients having diabetic macular edema. There was  
significant decrease in area of leaking vessels in  
proliferative diabetic retinopathy when treated with  
single dose of intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg).  
There was a significant improvement in mean visual  
acuity associated with it8. These studies reported that  
often in bilateral DME, Bevacizumab effects reduction  
in macular thickness in uninjected fellow eye and  
improvement in visual acuity was seen in 40% eyes  
injected with Bevacizumab12.  
Mansourian et al determined the efficacy of a  
single anti-VEGF injection of bevacizumab as primary  
treatment for diabetic macular edema. They compared  
the response to treatment using bevacizumab alone, in  
combination with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide  
and compared the response to macular laser  
photocoagulation. The result showed no significant  
difference between these two treatments in reducing  
the central macular thickness with improvement in  
visual acuity17.  
Yang et al compared the visual acuity, central  
retinal thickness and retinal sensitivity in different  
types of macular edema. He found that there was  
positive correlation between central foveal thickness  
and log MAR BCVA in patients with focal, diffuse  
and ischemic diabetic macular edema (r = 0.56, -0.62;  
P < 0.01).18  
According to previous studies, significant  
improvement of visual acuity was appreciated in  
diabetic macular edema with Bevacizumab when  
combined with dexamethasone, as compared to  
Bevacizumab monotherapy13. In this study, efficacy of  
treating diabetic macular with Anti-VEGF injection  
bevacizumab in diabetic patients was documented.  
Visual Acuity on Log MAR chart and central retinal  
thickness on OCT were the efficacy markers that were  
documented.  
Recent studies showed that visual outcome  
improves significantly if anti-VEGF therapy is started  
earlier in the course of disease. Patients presenting  
earlier with a shorter history of symptoms had better  
improvement in visual acuity and sustained decrease in  
central retinal thickness, 6 months after treatment.  
However patients with a prolonged disease history, the  
central retinal thickness and visual acuity at 3 months  
The mean BCVA on Log MAR chart at the start of  
the treatment was 0.42+/-0.14 Log MAR units. There  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 292-297  
295  
Muhammad Ali Haider, et al  
and 6 months post treatment would not be significantly  
different from baseline values at the start of  
treatment19. Thus, based on these results early  
treatment of macular edema is indicated for better and  
sustained anatomical and visual results. Thus earlier  
detection of reduced visual acuity is significantly  
important for the treatment of recurring macular  
edema. Another study highlighted the correlation  
between central subfield thickness and baseline visual  
acuity after treatment with Bevacizumab20.  
REFERENCES  
1. Bahrami B, Hong T, Gilles MC, Chang A. Anti-  
VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Eye Diseases. Asia Pac J  
Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Nov-Dec; 6 (6): 535-545.  
Doi: 10.22608/APO.2017350.  
2. Lam DS, Lai TY, Lee VY, Chan CK, Liu DT,  
Mohamed S, et al. Efficacy of 1.25 MG versus 2.5 MG  
intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema:  
six-month results of a randomized controlled trial.  
Retina. 2009; 29 (3): 292-9.  
3. Keane PA, Liakopoulos S, Chang KT, Wang M,  
Dustin L, Walsh AC, et al. Relationship between  
optical coherence tomography retinal parameters and  
visual acuity in neovascular age-related macular  
degeneration. Ophthalmology, 2008; 115 (12): 2206-  
14.  
4. Yang J, Wang X, Fuh G, Yu L, Wakshull E,  
Khosraviani M, et al. Comparison of binding  
characteristics and in vitro activities of three inhibitors  
of vascular endothelial growth factor A. Mol Pharm.  
2014; 11 (10): 3421-30.  
Consistent with other studies, younger age of  
patients with diabetic macular edema was associated  
with significantly improved visual acuitys and reduced  
central retinal thickness after every 6 weeks of  
treatment. However, if the treatment is delayed by  
more than  
6 weeks, repetition of intravitreal  
bevacizumab would not result in significant visual  
improvement22.  
Limitation of our study was the small sample size.  
We did not study the association of vascular patterns  
of macula on OCTA with decreased visual acuity,  
which is also a contributory factor in decreased visual  
acuity.  
5. Demirel S, Argo C, Agarwal A, Parriott J, Sepah  
YJ, Do DV, et al. Updates on the Clinical Trials in  
Diabetic Macular Edema. Middle East Afr  
Ophthalmol. 2016; 23 (1): 3-12.  
J
6. Pescosolido N, Pranno F, Buomprisco G. Intravitreal  
injections and diabetic macular edema: actual and new  
therapeutic options. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013; 9 (6):  
491-8.  
7. Vyas S, Thapa R, Bajimaya S, Pradhan E, Paudyal  
G. Anatomical and visual outcome of intravitreal  
bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with diabetic  
macular edema. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2016; 8 (15): 54-  
61.  
8. Das T, Aurora A, Chhablani J, Giridhar A, Kumar  
A, Raman R, et al. Evidence-based review of diabetic  
macular edema management: Consensus statement on  
Indian treatment guidelines. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016;  
64 (1): 14-25.  
9. Sala-Puigdollers A, Figueras-Roca M, Hereu M,  
Hernandez T, Morato M, Adan A, et al. Repeatability  
and reproducibility of retinal and choroidal thickness  
measurements in Diabetic Macular Edema using Swept-  
source Optical Coherence Tomography. PloS one,  
2018; 13 (7): e0200819.  
CONCLUSION  
Thus based on our study results, 45µm reduction in  
central macular thickness is associated with 0.1  
LogMAR unit improvement in visual acuity in patients  
with Diabetic Macular edema after a single dose of  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab (1.25 mg).  
Ethical Approval  
The study was approved by the Institutional review  
board/Ethical review board.  
Conflict of Interest  
Authors declared no conflict of interest.  
10. Browning DJ, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Beck RW,  
Brown DM, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical  
Research Network. Relationship between optical  
coherence tomography-measured central retinal  
thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema.  
Ophthalmology, 2007; 114 (3): 525-36.  
Author’s Designation and Contribution  
Muhammad Ali Haider; Assistant Professor: Study  
Design, Data collection, Manuscript writing, and  
review.  
11. Bhende M, Shetty S, Parthasarathy MK, Ramya S.  
Uzma Sattar; Optometrist: Compiling Results, Data  
Analysis, Article review.  
Optical coherence tomography:  
A
guide to  
interpretation of common macular diseases. Indian J  
Ophthalmol. 2018; 66 (1): 20-35.  
296  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 292-297  
Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema  
Soheilian M. Using skew-symmetric mixed models for  
investigating the effect of different diabetic macular  
edema treatments by analyzing central macular  
thickness and visual acuity responses. J Res Med Sci.  
2011; 16 (10): 1319-25.  
12. Hanhart J, Tiosano L, Averbukh E, Banin E, Hemo  
I, Chowers I, et al. Fellow eye effect of unilateral  
intravitreal bevacizumab injection in eyes with diabetic  
macular edema. Eye, 2014; 28 (6): 646-53.  
13. Maturi RK, Bleau L, Saunders J, Mubasher M,  
Stewart MW.  
A
12-Month, Single-Masked,  
18. Yang XL, Zou HD, Xu X. Correlation of retinal  
sensitivity, visual acuity and central macular thickness  
in different types of diabetic macular edema. Chinese J  
Ophthalmol. 2013; 49 (12): 1081-8.  
19. Jeong SH, Kim JH, Kim JW, Lee TG, Kim CG, Yoo  
SJ, et al. Patient's self-recognition of reduced visual  
acuity due to recurrence of macular edema and prompt  
visitation to the hospital in retinal vein occlusion.  
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014; 28 (3): 213-9.  
20. Deak GG, Schmidt-Erfurth UM, Jampol LM.  
Correlation of Central Retinal Thickness and Visual  
Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema. JAMA  
Ophthalmology, 2018.  
21. Scott IU, VanVeldhuisen PC, Ip MS, Blodi BA,  
Oden NL, King J, et al. Baseline Factors Associated  
with 6-Month Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness  
Outcomes in Patients with Macular Edema Secondary  
to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion or Hemiretinal Vein  
Occlusion: SCORE2 Study Report4. JAMA  
ophthalmology, 2017; 135 (6): 639-49.  
Randomized Controlled Study of Eyes with Persistent  
Diabetic Macular Edema after Multiple Anti-VEGF  
Injections to Assess the Efficacy of the  
Dexamethasone-Delayed Delivery System as an  
Adjunct to Bevacizumab Compared with Continued  
Bevacizumab Monotherapy. Retina, 2015; 35 (8):  
1604-14.  
14. Tareen IU, Rahman A, Mahar PS, Memon MS.  
Primary effects of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients  
with diabetic macular edema. Pak J Med Sci. 2013; 29  
(4): 1018-22.  
15. Ristic D, Vukosavljevic M, Draganic B, Cerovic V,  
Petrovic N, Janicijevic-Petrovic M. The effect of  
intravitreal administration of bevacizumab on macular  
edema and visual acuity in age-related macular  
degeneration  
with  
subfoveolar  
choroidal  
neovascularisation. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2013; 70  
(7): 660-3.  
16. Santos AR, Gomes SC, Figueira J, Nunes S, Lobo  
CL, Cunha-Vaz JG. Degree of decrease in central  
retinal thickness predicts visual acuity response to  
intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema.  
Ophthalmologica. 2014; 231 (1): 16-22.  
22. Epstein DL, Algvere PV, von Wendt G, Seregard S,  
Kvanta A. Benefit from bevacizumab for macular  
edema in central retinal vein occlusion: twelve-month  
results of  
a
prospective, randomized study.  
Ophthalmology, 2012; 119 (12): 2587-91.  
17. Mansourian M, Kazemnejad A, Kazemi I, Zayeri F,  
.…….  
Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (3): 292-297  
297