Fiza Shaheen, et al
with +13.00 Diopter spherical lens. After two and half
months, secondary lens implant in the sulcus was
performed after which her visual acuity improved to
0.5 log-MAR with best correction. Later she was
advised patching to prevent amblyopia and vision
further improved to 0.3 log-MAR.
Author’s Contribution
FS: Manuscript drafting, literature review and final
review.
RN: literature search and final review.
AA: literature search and final review.
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
DISCUSSION
Ocular trauma is quiet common especially in the
developing countries accounting for 12.9% of all the
admitted cases6. The common causes include injury
with bow and arrows, needles, tools and hooks and
firecracker injury. According to the Ocular Trauma
Classification group, nature of injuries can be
classified as closed globe injuries and open globe
injuries as well as a third group of chemical injuries7.
REFERENCES
1. Qayum S, Anjum R, Rather S. Epidemiological
profile of pediatric ocular trauma in a tertiary hospital
of northern India. Chinese J Ophthalmol. 2018; 21 (2):
100-3.
2. Niiranen M, Raivio IL. Eye injuries in children. Br J
Ophthalmol. 1981; 65 (6): 436-8.
3. Grin TR, Nelson LB, Jeffers JB. Eye injuries in
childhood. Pediatrics. 1987; 80 (1): 13-7.
4. LaRoche GR, McIntyre L, Schertzer RM.
Epidemiology of severe eye injuries in childhood.
Ophthalmology, 1988; 95 (12): 1603-7.
Ocular trauma with party accessories was reported
in another study in which chemical injuries caused by
snow sprays including chemical conjunctivitis,
superficial punctate keratopathy, corneal and
conjunctival erosions8. Other studies described the
ocular injuries caused by water balloon slingshots9.
Pellet gun injuries have been mentioned in local
literature11.
5. Nelson LB, Wilson TW, Jeffers JB. Eye injuries in
childhood: demography, etiology, and prevention.
Pediatrics, 1989; 84 (3): 438-41.
6. Thylefors B. Epidemiological patterns of ocular
trauma. Aus New Zeal J Ophthalmol. 1992; 20 (2): 95-
8.
7. Saxena R, Sinha R, Purohit A, Dada T, Vajpayee
RB, Azad RV. Pattern of pediatric ocular trauma in
India. Indian J Pediatr. 2002 Oct. 1; 69 (10): 863-7.
8. Abulafia A, Segev F, Platner E, Simon GJ. Party
foam-induced eye injuries and the power of media
intervention. Cornea, 2013; 32 (6): 826-9.
9. Bullock JD, Johnson DA, Ballal DR, Bullock RJ.
Ocular and orbital trauma from water balloon
slingshots: a clinical, epidemiological, experimental
and theoretical study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;
94:105-134.
The two cases we have described above highlight
the potential of these gadgets in causing open as well
as closed globe injuries. Although the introduction of
various hi tech gadgets in our everyday life style have
improved the quality of life in various ways, their use
must be accompanied with safety measures. There
should be proper guidelines regarding their utility and
the description of their potential harm must be
discussed. With the common utilization of these
devices, such devastating incidents might increase in
the future which should be effectively tackled before
time.
10. Cohn RA, Olsen KR. Retinal commotio and tears from
a water balloon injury. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112
(8): 1021–1021.
11. Bahoo MLA, Jamil AZ, Karamat B. Frequency and
characteristics of ocular trauma in a Tertiary Care
Hospital in Lodhran. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2019; 35 (2):
116-12.
CONCLUSION
We strongly stress the need of awareness programs
using social and media services. Party accessories
although intended for fun, must be carefully used if
not possibly avoided.
.…….
179
Pakistan Journal of J Ophthalmology, 2020, Vol. 36 (1): 177-179